Criminal Justice Administration (1781-90).......
Magistrates did not have ability to prosecute the crime.They could only take the case from the subordinate policemen and if they considered appropriate in the time of crime they would have sent them to Darogaa for Justice. Daroga was an officerer working under zizam.
Provide power to magistrates for managing small cases.....In 1785 the government gave powers to magistrates to impose punishments not less than four days and 15 days after hearing the cases such as the theft of physical assault, such as physical assault outside, the magistrate couldn’t interfere.
Plenty of time......There was a lot of time in the hearing of the case.A 1970 statement found that before hearing the transfer of the accused to Darogaa, it would take an average of one month for the hearing. If the evidence was presented quickly then verdict could be pronounced within 8 to 10 months. But where there was no such simplification, the guilty would have to face trial for 4 to 6 years.Those who are being judged by this system or those who are awaiting authority from Nizam, often go out on bail, even if the killer and the other person were treated the same way. As a result of this unsual observation, the level of work was very low. Throughout the day, only one case was filed between Magistrate and Daroga. The main reason for this delay was that all the cases of this Bengal were sent to Naib Nizam for the verdict and no case was settled on the spot.
Humble and polite attributables:There is not much to know about the Daroga court.The trial of the judges seemed humble and modest in nature when they used to punish a small punishment as punishment for morder or Robbery. In this case, the magjstrate was advise that they would be sued in the Darogara court for better conduct of the case. In April 1971, there were some murder and Robbery cases which were awarded to 39 Battasat or 4 months in prison or one year.
Planning and Implementation: Cabinet Division, A2I, BCC, DoICT and BASIS